Essay This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
This copyrighted work contains special tracking code to identify plagiarists. Publicity is the very soul of justice. It is the very spur to exertion and the surest of all guards against improbity". So said the famous 18th century Utilitarianist and philosopher, Jeremy Bentham.
A quote occasionally revisited in more recent times to remind ourselves of the inextricable binding of these two disciplines. Even so, the law and journalism have been difficult bed partners for almost as long as history has been recorded.
Each cannot exist without the other, the relationship often swinging from deep hatred to all-embracing love. On one side, the making of laws, their inherent vagaries and the inconsistencies of their policing create constant aggravation with the other.
From the reverse perspective, the sometimes brutal and harsh frankness, the incessant inquisitiveness and indiscretion often causes deep hurt and indignation with the authoritative partner. And so goes the constant ebb and flow of the tide.
All over the world, the two exist together in varying degrees of balance. The most common and unfortunate situation being where law stifles comment, often with great brutality. A traditional 'pen versus sword' struggle.
In Australia we mightn't suffer Identification of user community essay dictatorial oppression, instead there is almost a 'three's a crowd' situation with the competing interests and responsibilities of the courts, the parliament, the government and the press. This sometimes difficult menage a trois has its own set of pros and cons.
Two aggrieved parties are often restrained by a third in an oddly rotational adversarial forum, thereby preventing one sustaining, and the other from inflicting too much damage. The joys of democracy and the Westminster system! A system once said to be "the worst system in the world Beware The Two-Headed Beast Unlike under the overly oppressive regimes of other countries, journalists in this country only have to deal with the double-headed beast of contempt and defamation.
Each set of jaws ready to rip into the unwary media for uttering some perceived blasphemy. And this 'blasphemy' may be a simple as just telling the truth. The sort of bravado stylised in Wilson's statement above may be fine for some, but Australian journalists like the ABC 's Chris Masters would look on that statement with horror.
Masters' situation is one where his news-sense and belief in the public's right to know drove his zeal for the story. In many respects his passion was vindicated by the subsequent Fitzgerald Inquirybut a painful lesson was nevertheless learnt. Despite having worked scrupulously within the confines of the defamation law, powerful figures were still able to cause him and his producers considerable grief.
As a result of this, Masters now believes in-depth investigative reporting to be a "dying art". During an interview on ABC's 2BL, Masters said that he would never have touched the story if he had known that he would have to "do ten times the amount of work defending it than producing it.
The public clearly has a right to be alerted to any scurrilous behaviour amongst their elected members, the bureaucracy, big business or, less commonly, within the judiciary. Yet, because of the so-called "chilling effect" the threat of defamation places on some public discussion, stories are simply filed under "too hard" or perhaps more accurately, "too risky".
The media becomes a flaccid tool of vested interest, mere prostitutes for their moneyed masters? Sure, that mercenary aspect will always exist, but then so will the reverse. There will always be a movement of passionate, brimstone-bellied individuals concerned with revealing that which someone, somewhere doesn't want revealed.
Real news, not disguised advertising or PR. So how then should these motivated souls be heard? How can they protect crucial confidential sources from inquisitors?Free Community papers, essays, and research papers. Community Identification Paper - Community Identification Walnut Park is a census-designated place (CDP) in the Los Angeles County in the state of California.
Patient identification and the matching of a patient to an intended treatment is an activity that is performed routinely in all care settings. Risks to patient safety occur when there is a mismatch between a given patient and components of their care, whether these components are .
You can order a custom essay, term paper, research paper, thesis or dissertation on Community related topics at our professional custom essay writing service which provides students with custom papers written by highly qualified academic writers. High quality and no plagiarism guarantee!
Papers - Identification of User Community.
Community Identification Paper - Community Identification Walnut Park is a census-designated place (CDP) in the Los Angeles County in the state of California.
A community has the power to define an individual’s role based on gender, sexuality, or race, ultimately limiting his or her identity. The structure of every community is different, meaning that an individual’s role will differ and he or .
A radio-frequency identification system uses tags, or labels attached to the objects to be identified. Two-way radio transmitter-receivers called interrogators or readers send a signal to the tag and read its response..
RFID tags can be either passive, active or battery-assisted passive.