Which type of intelligence do we prefer, book smart or street smart? Learning through traditional, organized education or learning important life lessons through trial and error and tough love? When hearing these terms, what do you think of? For many, the stereotypical book smart person is usually some type of nerd or geek, adjusting his or her glasses while burying his or her head in some type of book.
For example if you give a college student an eight page essay to write on a topic interest of their own, not only will they understand it but can relate it to their everyday social life. Students do need to read pieces of intellectually challenging writing if they are to become intellectuals themselves.
Students would start out on a better foot and acquire a substantial amount of motivation first by reading and analyzing subjects that inspire them rather than some boring subjects like Shakespeare or Orwell Graff. In this day and age where our culture values sports and entertainment, Graff believed that knowledge would hold us back from a social life, yet he still argues the fact that sports is a much better topic to be interested in more so then anything else.
As a sports fan I know exactly what he is trying to get at. The sports world is much more interesting than anything that has to do with academics to me. Close bonding and community is brought from sports such as high school football in a small town, everyone likes to go and watch the game and cheer for them or analyze the players abilities and how they could improve.
Things like this are what bring up public issues and generates an environment chunk full of excitement and debates. Although some readers might challenge my view by insisting that students cannot become intellectuals by reading sports or fashion magazines alone.
This means to think and write about cars, sports, and fashion in an interpretive, analytical way, a student that sees them as miniatures of what is happening in a broader culture or way of life.
This interpretation challenges the work of those critics who have long assumed that an individual learns best by introducing academic representations such as Shakespeare or Orwell. If a student cannot get interested in Shakespeare or Orwell but will read sports or fashion magazines with absorption, it presents a strong argument for assigning these magazines over the classic boring tactics.
Doing so should get them hooked on reading and writing by composing papers on those subjects and eventually get to the classics.Book smarts vs. Street smarts Posted on February 9, April 5, in Philosophy, reader's choice by Scott Berkun In a series of posts, called readers choice .
Street Smarts over Book Smarts Gerald Graff is a Professor of English and Education in the University of Illinois at Chicago. In Graff’s essay, “Hidden Intellectualism”, Graff compares street smarts to book smarts.
Essay about Street Smarts vs. Book Smarts in Academia Words 6 Pages Our society has always had an obsession with labels whether in the form of fashion, our description of personal relationships, or the way we see ourselves as individuals.
Street Smarts vs. Book Smarts in Academia Essay - Our society has always had an obsession with labels whether in the form of fashion, our description of personal relationships, or the way we see ourselves as individuals.
One of the greatest keys to balancing book smarts and street smarts is knowing that you are your own best asset. To be an asset, you need to think outside the box and on a global scale. To be an asset, you need to think outside the box and on a global scale.
Street Smart versus Book Smart In his article “Hidden Intellectualism,” Gerald Graff criticizes those that do not put value into “street smarts. ” Graff says that knowledge goes far beyond academic learning and continues into our everyday living.
He states, “The need to prove I was smart and the fear of a beating if I [ ].